|
[ Introduction ] [ Participating Centres ] [ Lead Centre Monitoring ] [ Procedures and Formats ] [ Report Types ] [ Focal Points ] [ Related Links ] MANUAL ON THE GLOBAL DATA-PROCESSING SYSTEM
ATTACHMENT II.10
PROCEDURES AND FORMATS FOR EXCHANGE OF MONITORING RESULTS 1. General remarks 1.1 Centres participating in the exchange of monitoring results will implement standard procedures and use agreed formats for communicating the information both to other centres and to the data providers. The following list is incomplete and requires further development in the light of practical experience. Guidance will be given through the initiative of the lead centres in their corresponding fields of responsibility. 1.2 Lead centres who are informed of remedial actions being taken should provide this information to all participating centres. The WMO Secretariat shall forward, every six months, the information it receives to the relevant lead centres. All lead centres shall produce for the WMO Secretariat a yearly summary of information made available to them and/or of those actions taken within their area of responsibility. 2. Upper-air observations (back to top) 2.1 Monthly exchange for upper-air observations should include lists of stations/ships with the following information. 2.1.1 List 1: GEOPOTENTIAL HEIGHT Month/year Selection criteria: FOR 0000 AND 1200 UTC SEPARATELY, AT LEAST THREE LEVELS WITH 10 OBSERVATIONS DURING THE MONTH AND 100 M WEIGHTED RMS DEPARTURE FROM THE FIELD USED FOR COMPARISON BETWEEN 1000 hPa AND 30 hPa. The gross error limits to be used for observed minus reference field are as follows: Level Geop 1000 hPa 100 m Weights to be used at each level are as follows: Level Weight 1000 hPa 3.70 Data to be listed for each station/ship should include: - WMO
identifier 2.1.2 List 2: TEMPERATURE Besides the geopotential height, temperature monitoring should be included at standard levels. As an initial criteria the gross error thresholds to be considered could be: 15 degrees for p>700 hPa 2.1.3 List 3: WIND Month/year Selection criteria: FOR 0000 AND 1200 UTC SEPARATELY, AT LEAST ONE LEVEL WITH 10 OBSERVATIONS DURING THE MONTH AND 15 m s-1 RMS VECTOR DEPARTURE FROM THE FIELD USED FOR COMPARISON, BETWEEN 1000 hPa AND 100 hPa. The gross error limits to be used are as follows: Level Wind 1000 hPa 35 m s-1 Data to be listed for each selected station/ship should include: - WMO
identifier 2.1.4 List 4: WIND DIRECTION The method used for computing the wind direction bias should be included in the reports (clockwise or anticlockwise) Month/year Selection criteria: FOR 0000 AND 1200 UTC SEPARATELY, AT LEAST FIVE OBSERVATIONS AT EACH STANDARD LEVEL FROM 500 hPa TO 150 hPa, FOR THE AVERAGE OVER THAT LAYER, MEAN DEPARTURE FROM REFERENCE FIELD AT LEAST +/- 10 DEGRESS, STANDARD DEVIATION LESS THAN 30 DEGREES, MAXIMUM VERTICAL SPREAD LESS THAN 10 DEGREES. Same limits for gross errors as above. Data for which the wind speed is less than 5 m s-1, either observed or calculated, should also be excluded from the statistics. Data to be listed for each selected station/ship should include: - WMO
identifier NOTES: (1) The responsibility for updating this attachment rests with the lead centres. (2) Urgent changes to this attachment recommended by the lead centres shall be approved, on behalf of the Commission for Basic Systems, by the president of the Commission. 2.1.5 The Profilers should be monitored (suspect platforms) using the same criteria as for the radiosondes. 3. Land surface observations (back to top) 3.1 The criteria for the production of monthly list of suspect stations are as follows: 3.1.1 List 1: MSL PRESSURE Element: MSL pressure, surface synoptic observations at 0000, 0600, 1200 or 1800 UTC compared to the first guess field of a data assimilation model (usually a six-hour forecast). Number of observations: at least twenty for at least four observation times, without distinguishing between observation times. One or more of the following: Absolute value of the mean bias > 4 hPa 3.1.2 List 2: STATION LEVEL PRESSURE The criteria for station level pressure monitoring is the same as for MSLP above. 3.1.3 List 2: GEOPOTENTIAL HEIGHT Element: Geopotential height, from surface synoptic observations or derived from station-level pressure, temperature and published station elevations at 0000, 0600, 1200 or 1800 UTC compared to the first-guess field of a data assimilation model (usually a six-hour forecast). Number of observations: at least twenty for at least four observation times, without distinguishing between observation times. One or more of the following: Absolute value of the mean bias 30 m 3.1.4 PRECIPITATION General guidance reflecting Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) procedures for precipitation quality monitoring is given in section 6.3.3.1 of the Guide on the Global Data-processing System. NOTES: (1) All monitoring centres are asked to conform to the above specified criteria. These monthly lists should be prepared for at least the regional association of the lead centres and, if possible, for other regional associations. Consolidated lists of suspect stations should be produced every six months by the lead centres (JanuaryJune and JulyDecember) and forwarded to the WMO Secretariat for further action. (2) The stations on these consolidated lists should be those appearing on all six-monthly lists of the lead centres. Other stations could be added to the consolidated list if the lead centres judges that there is sufficient evidence for their inclusion. Each centre should send its proposed consolidated list to all participating monitoring centres for comment. The final list would then be forwarded to the WMO Secretariat. 4. Surface Marine Observations (back to top) 4.1 Monthly exchange for surface marine observations should include lists of suspect ships/buoys/platforms with the following additional information: Month/year All surface marine data may be included, not just observations at the main hours of 00, 06, 12 and 18 UTC. 4.2 The elements to be monitored should include mean sea level pressure 4.3 Data to be listed for each ship/buoy/platform and each element should include: - WMO
identifier 4.4 The criteria for the production of the monthly list of suspect stations are as follows: 4.4.1 List 1: Mean Sea Level Pressure Number of observations: at least 20. One or more of the following: Absolute value of the mean bias > 4 hPa 4.4.2 List 2: Wind Speed Number of observations: at least 20. One or more of the following: 4.4.3 List 3: Wind Direction Data for which the wind speed is less than 5 ms-1, either observed or calculated, should be excluded from the statistics. Number of observations: at least 20. One or more of the following: Absolute value of the mean bias > 30o 4.4.4 List 4: Air Temperature Number of observations: at least 20. One or more of the following: Absolute value of the mean bias > 4oC 4.4.5 List 5: Relative humidity Number of observations: at least 20. One or more of the following: Absolute value of the mean bias > 30% 4.4.6 List 6: Sea Surface Temperature Number of observations: at least 20. One or more of the following: Absolute value of the mean bias > 3o C 5. Aircraft Data (back to top) 5.1 The criteria for the production of the monthly list of suspect Aircraft temperatures and winds observations are as follows: 5.1.1 Automated aircraft observations, both AMDAR and ACARS, will separately be listed as suspect for temperatures and winds in three pressure categories if the data statistics exceed criteria defined in Table below. The three pressure categories are: Low surface to 701 hPa; Mid 700 to 301 hPa; and High 300 hPa and above. To be considered suspect, the number of observations must meet minimal counts and the data statistics versus the guess must exceed at least one criterion or the gross rejection rate must exceed 2%. Thus if the magnitude of the temperature or speed bias exceed the criterion or the RMS differences to the guess exceed the limit for the pressure category, the aircraft is listed as suspect for that pressure category. Observations differing from the guess by amounts larger than gross check limits will be considered gross and not used in computing bias and RMS differences. If the number of gross observations (NG) for a pressure category exceeds 2% of the total number of checked observations, then the aircraft will be listed as suspect. After data thinning for assimilation, the remaining number of observations is NT. The number of rejected observations excluding thinning (NR) is an optional statistic for information, and for which operational practice should be documented List: Temperature and wind Month/year Each aircraft that is suspect will be listed as follows in one line: - aircraft ID 5.1.2 Suspect automated aircraft temperatures and winds observations Criteria
5.1.3 AIREP Monthly exchange for AIREP observations should include lists of airlines
with the following information: Data to be listed for each airline - Airline ID 6.1 Satellite data monitoring criteria are as specified in the following table
|