|
WWW Technical Progress Report on the Global Data Processing System 1999 Korea Meteorological Administration 1. Summary of highlights The whole NWP system was upgraded when a new supercomputer SX5/16A was put into operation in June 1999. The new system includes the high resolution limited area model system HLAM (triple-nested mesh of 63/21/7km, 43 layers), and the global wave model GoWAM (mesh of 2 deg x 2 deg). The horizontal resolution of regional data assimilation and prediction system (RDAPS) has been enhanced by 30km with 33 layers in height. New analysis tools and observations are incorporated in the global data assimilation and prediction system (GDAPS). PAOB data has been used for global analysis since January 1999. Direct TOVS radiance assimilation, namely 1D-VAR, is operated in GDAPS from May 1999. The overall performance of GDAPS has been significantly improved with the enhanced analysis. An ensemble prediction system with 8 members was put into operation for the projection up to one month. 2. Equipment in Use at the Centre The supercomputer SX-5/16A (NEC), installed at Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) headquarter building in June 1999, is dedicated for the numerical weather prediction and climate simulation.
3. Data and products from GTS in use The following types of observations are presently used in the analysis system. The numbers indicate typical amounts received during a 24 - hour period: Table 1. Data used for daily operation
4. Data Input System Fully automated system 5. Quality Control System Various real-time quality control checks are performed for each observation received from GTS. In particular:
6. Monitoring of Observing System Surface observations are monitored on the national level. 7. Forecasting System The GDAPS (T106L21) originally developed at Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) has been running in operational basis. Along with the intermittent 4-dimensional data assimilation having 6 hour updating cycle, the GDAPS produces 240 hour projections for the large-scale atmospheric variables. It also produces 3-day forecasts for typhoon tracks, and time-dependent lateral boundary conditions for the regional models. The RDAPS also runs twice a day for 48 hour forecasts, with 12 hour pre-assimilation with dynamic nudging. Four typhoon track forecasts are obtained from GFDK, BATS, RDAPS and GDAPS, when typhoon approaches Korean Peninsula. In addition, there are two types of applied models; prognostic models for wave height on both global and regional domain, and statistical models for max/min temperature and probability of precipitation. 7.1. System Run Schedule Two types of the global forecasts are produced at KMA. The GDAPS for 84-hour projection runs from the observed analysis at 0000 UTC and 1200 UTC respectively with 2.5 hour data cutoff, which is used for short-range weather forecasts and for the provision of lateral boundary condition for the regional models. The GDAPS for 10-day projection runs from observed analysis at 1200 UTC with 10 hour data cutoff, which is to utilize as much observation as available. The RDAPS runs twice a day (0000 and 1200 UTC) for 48-h forecasts. The two independent analysis system is used for the provision of initial condition for GDAPS and RDAPS respectively. 7.2. Medium-range Forecasting System 7.2.1 Data assimilation, objective analysis and initialization The KMA global data assimilation system is a typical four-dimensional analysis/forecast system with 6-hr cycle. A 6-hr forecast from the previous run provides a first guess for the next analysis. If a typhoon exists in the Northwestern Pacific, a typhoon bogus profile is calculated and embedded in the first guess fields. The best fits of analysis are made with the 2-D multivariate optimal interpolation analysis for heights and winds, and with the univariate analysis for relative humidity and surface observations.
Thickness associated with moisture content is retrieved from TOVS radiance data by using the 1 D-variational technique.
The moisture analysis is corrected with the input of cloud information at different vertical layers including cloud top temperature derived from GMS-5 images. The increments of the analysis against the first guess are computed, and the analysis increments are interpolated back to model levels. A non-linear normal mode initialization with full physics is then performed in order to reduce the amplitude of high-frequency gravity waves. The iteration method is adopted to converge the nonlinear balanced solution, and it stops after three times of iteration. The high frequency component is filtered out for each spherical harmonic components in the five gravest vertical modes which exceeds the critical frequency. 7.2.2 Model configuration
Dynamics
Physics
7.2.3. Numerical Weather Prediction Products A series of standard analysis products are available in electronic or in chart form (i.e. surface analysis of temperature and MSLP, upper air geopotential, winds, temperature at 925, 850, 700, 500, 300, 100 hPa) A series of standard forecast products are available in electronic or in chart form (i. e. MSLP and 12-hour accumulated precipitation, geopotential height, vorticity, temperature at 500 hPa, temperature and winds at 850 hPa, vertical velocity and dew-point depression at 700hPa). Other specialized products are available such as potential vorticity at isentropic surface (300, 315, 330, 350 K). 7.2.4. Operational Techniques for Application of NWP Products The global forecasts of GDAPS is used for the first guess in the analyses of regional model and typhoon models. 7.2.5 Extended-range forecasting system An ensemble prediction system (EPS), based on simple time lagged approach with T106 global spectral model, has been semi-operational since November 1999. An ensemble of 8 members are obtained from the sequence of 6 hourly analysis. The EPS runs for 30 day projection once a day at 12 UTC. 7.3. Short-range Forecasting System After more than 12 months of pre-operational test, the new RDAPS (Regional Data Assimilation and Prediction System) became operational in June 1999. The RDAPS is adopted from the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model version 5 (RDAPS). The old version (MM4) was switched off on 1 October 1999. New high resolution limited area model system (HRLM) also has been running in semi-operational mode.7.3.1 Data assimilation, objective analysis and initialization Objective Analysis
Assimilation
Dynamics
Physics
7.3.3 High Resolution Limited Area Model (HLAM) Configurations
7.4 Application for NWP products. A statistical model with Kalman filter (KF) produces the maximum and minimum temperature forecasts for 61 stations up to 48 hours. 7.5 Ocean wave Prediction system Two numerical wave models are currently on operation: Global Wave Model (GoWAM) and Regional Wave model (ReWAM). Both models are adopted from the 3rd generation WAM model cycle 4 (developed by WAMDI group). Table 2. Specification of ocean wave prediction models
7.6 Typhoon Track Prediction System The GDAPS and RDAPS produce their own typhoon track forecasts. Typhoon track forecasts are provided from four different models, GFDK, BATS, GDAPS, and RDAPS. The GFDL hurricane model in Korea (GFDK) is the KMA version of hurricane model developed by NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory. It runs at 0600 UTC and 1800 UTC for the prediction of typhoon track and intensity forecasts since 1997. The GFDK has a triple-nested, movable mesh with an innermost grid spacing of 1/6 , and with the sophisticated vortex initialization procedure. The Barotropic Adaptive grid Typhoon System (BATS) is based on the continuous dynamic grid adaptation technique with the innermost grid spacing of 0.3 . This model has an advantage to represent the typhoon vortex in more detail. It has been performed four times a day since 1997. 7.6.1. Geophysical Fluid Dynamic in Korea (GFDK) Typhoon Model Input Data
Vortex Bogusing and Initialization
Dynamics
Physics
Products
7.6.2 Barotropic Adaptive Typhoon System (BATS) Input Data
Vortex Bogusing and Initialization
Dynamics
Products
8. Verification The verification statistics for GDAPS is operationally performed against analysis and radiosonde observations. Results of the monthly verification for the year of 1999 are presented in Table 3. The verification for RDAPS, wave model and KF model are shown in Table 4-6. 9. Plan for 2000 9.1. GDAPS Implementation of 3-D optimal interpolation analysis system on sigma coordinate Incorporation of Emanuel cumulus parameterization scheme Improvement of ensemble generation procedure using breeding method Implementation of trajectory model for dust storm (yellow sand) prediction 9.2 RDAPS
Table 3.1 Root mean square errors of geopotential height at 500 hPa against analysis (m) Northern Hemisphere
Table 3.2 Root mean square errors of geopotential height at 500 hPa against analysis (m) Southern Hemisphere
Table 3.3 Root mean square of vector wind errors at 250 hPa against analysis (m/s) Northern Hemisphere
Table 3.4 Root mean square of vector wind errors at 250 hPa against analysis (m/s) Southern Hemisphere
Table 3.5 Root mean square of vector wind errors at 250 hPa against analysis (m/s) Tropic
Table 3.6 Root mean square errors of geopotential height at 850 hPa against observations (m) Northern Hemisphere
Table 3.7 Root mean square errors of geopotential height at 850 hPa against observations (m) Asia
Table 3.8 Root mean square errors of geopotential height at 850 hPa against observations (m) Tropic
Table 3.9 Root mean square errors of geopotential height at 500 hPa against observations (m) Northern Hemisphere
Table 3.10 Root mean square errors of geopotential height at 500 hPa against observations (m) Asia
Table 3.11 Root mean square errors of geopotential height at 500 hPa against observations (m) Tropic
Table 3.12 Root mean square of vector wind errors at 250 hPa against observations (m/s) Northern Hemisphere
Table 3.13 Root mean square of vector wind errors at 250 hPa against observations (m/s) Asia
Table 3.14 Root mean square of vector wind errors at 250 hPa against observations (m/s) Tropic
Table 4. Root mean square errors of RDAPS and HLAM during August to December 1999
Table 5.1 Bias & RMSE of ReWAM (3 buoy, 24H FCST)
Table 5.2 Bias & RMSE of GoWAM (18 buoy, 24H FCST)
Table 6. The RMSE (BIAS) of KF during 1st June - 31st Dec 1999.
|